Saturday, January 19, 2013

Foreign Bonds With Currency Hedging

Reader Question

Hey LTR, Here is a question, would it be possible get a higher return on fixed income by buying bonds in a foreign country (assume maybe a foreign country that has developed financial markets so it's risk equivalent to buy in US or close to risk equivalent) and then hedging the currency exposure to get a higher interest rate? I have zero expertise in both areas, maybe the currency hedge cost wipes out any interest rate premium gain. I'm sure others have thought of this. Thanks

My Reply

Good question. Unfortunately, it is as you guessed -- the currency hedge wipes out the deal. Here is why this happens...

You can think of any trade as going long whatever you buy and short whatever you sell. Investing in a regular domestic 10-year bond, for example, is going (long 10-year bond + short 0-year bond). That "0-year bond" is how I like to think of cash when discussing investing. Your net gain from the trade, relative to having not made the trade, is the return from your long investment minus the return from your short investment. If you hold to maturity and the 10-year bond ends up returning 40% while 0-year bond (cash) returns 30% in the same time span, then the trade netted you 10%. It's true that your total return is 40%, but you would have got 30% even if you did not make this particular trade. So the net gain from the trade is just 10%.

Once you start thinking in these terms, it becomes easy to analyze any trade, including investing in foreign bonds with currency hedging... Let's say you're buying 10-year Australian bonds. You go (long 10-year AUS bond + short 0-year US bond). The 0-year US bond is, of course, your US dollar-denominated cash. Then you need to establish your currency hedge. All that is is buying US cash with AUS cash, meaning you go (long US 0-year bond + short AUS 0-year bond). Add up your two trades. Short 0-year US bond from the first trade cancels with long US 0-year bond from the second trade. Your net trade becomes (long 10-year AUS bond + short 0-year AUS bond).

Now hopefully the problem becomes clear. If Australia has higher interest rates than the US, it will (generally speaking) have them higher across the yield curve, from 0-year bonds to 10-year bonds. Since your trade is (long 10-year AUS bond + short 0-year AUS bond), your gain from higher interest rate on the 10-year AUS bond is offset by the similarly higher interest rate from 0-year AUS bond. Whether Australia's interest rates are higher than US rates by 2% or 3% or even 10% across the yield curve, this currency-hedged trade would still net you big fat zero relative to simply buying the US 10-year bond to begin with.

The reality is even worse. One of the frictional costs of participating in the forex market is that you will not get all of the expected interest on the currency you are long while paying more than expected interest on the currency you are short. I have never traded forex and honestly don't even know the magnitude of this spread, but it is there. That might add another 0.1% or 0.2% or whatever the spread happens to be to the cost of the currency hedge. Now what was a break-even trade actually becomes a losing one.

This is why currency-hedged foreign bond investing is not often done in practice. The only way it stands good chance of being more profitable than investing in domestic bonds of same maturities is if the domestic yield curve is quite flat while the foreign yield curve is quite steep. For example, let's suppose 0-year US bond pays 2% while US 10-year bond pays 2.5%. Your expected profit (assuming the yield curve stays frozen in time -- which, of course, it won't) is just 0.5% per year if you go (long 10-year US bond + short 0-year US bond). But suppose 0-year AUS bond pays the same 2% while 10-year AUS bond pays 5%. Your expected profit from investing in currency-hedged 10-year AUS bond is now 3% minus whatever the frictional costs happen to be (which, remember, include the broker's skimming off the interest rate).

However even that last scenario is not fool-proof. The yield curves are not frozen in time, so it's quite possible that the short-end of the Australian yield curve quickly rises close to the long-end level, making the Australian yield curve flat, similarly to the US curve. Now your short 0-year AUS bond position will be costing you, say, 4% a year instead of 2% a year, which combined with the ever-present frictional costs could make your initially promising trade a barely profitable or even a losing one.

And, of course, if you never establish the currency hedge you expose yourself to the currency risk which is not present in investing in domestic bonds. Sometimes taking such currency risk pays off big time. If you had been investing in emerging markets bonds for the past 15 years or so you would have reaped great profits, both from high starting interest rates and currency appreciation relative to the dollar. I think such investments might have even exceeded the terrific returns from emerging market equities and definitely exceeded the very substantial returns from plain old domestic US bonds over the same time period. But, of course, currency risk could just as easily move against you -- as was likely felt (at least until a few months ago) by Japanese investors of the recent years who decided to look for higher yields abroad.

5 comments:

  1. Very very interesting analysis as always LTR. Thank you again for a brilliant blog.

    At the end of your post you warn off un-hedged foreign bonds because of currency risk. Does the same analysis apply to foreign real return bonds?

    I have a small holding (3.5%) in an iShares foreign inflation-linked bond ETF (IGIL). I took this position because I thought IGIL would have a low correlation with my other assets. I rationalised that if there was low-foreign inflation then IGIL would do well, as the foreign currencies would likely be high. If there was foreign inflation then IGIL will do well although clearly depreciating foreign currency might erode some of the return.

    I would be very interested to hear what you think about my analysis (which might be completely wrong).

    I should add that I am a UK-based sterling investor. Over the last forty years sterling has been a weak currency which might mean that even if the strategy is advisable for me it may not be for a US dollar investor.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I should have written UNEXPECTED foreign inflation and 'lower than expected foreign inflation'. I have a reasonable understanding of how domestic inflation-linked gilts & TIPS work and the current low yields but am mainly interested in the foreign currency aspect of inflation-linked bond behaviour.

    Thanks again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your kind words about this blog. I definitely don't think it's brilliant, but I do hope it's useful to at least some people -- and I appreciate the compliment!

      I think you are right to expect foreign currencies to depreciate in inflation and vice versa, but that's only one of the factors that influence forex rates. A change in pretty much any major economic statistic will be reflected in forex rates -- from export/import balance to relative income levels between two countries to relative prices between two countries. And that's before you consider speculative factors like the carry trade. Forex is a very complex system that can't be tied to a single factor like inflation.

      None of that means that your IGIL investment is a bad one and at just 3.5% of your portfolio it won't make a big difference either way. But I wouldn't try to put together a specific narrative for this investment. Just treat it as any of your other fixed income investments. It has what, I believe, is a reasonable for UK expense ratio of 0.25% and it invests in highly-rated government debt, so there is no concern about defaults (at least not any more concern about default than would be with any conceivable fixed-income alternative).

      The currency movements will make it more volatile. And, unfortunately, the half of its holdings that I am familiar with -- US TIPS -- will necessarily have low returns in the coming years (currency fluctuations excepted) -- but that's a factor of today's fixed-income market, not a flaw in IGIL in particular.

      I have only the faintest idea of the kinds of fixed income investments are available to you, so I couldn't tell you whether you can improve on IGIL. From what I do know I would classify IGIL (with apologies to Douglas Adams) as mostly harmless -- not worth going out of your way to invest in and, equally, not worth going out of your way to expunge from portfolio once it's there. And at 3.5% of the portfolio it just doesn't matter a whole lot.

      Delete
  3. You should look into the idea of forward rates and how they relate to future spot rates. The story isn't quite as bad as you make it appear. Many of those low yielding currencies are expected by the market to appreciate in value, so when you hedge you get to sell the currency at the expected higher future spot rate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the comment. I'll have to think about that... At first read this wouldn't seem to make a difference: you would still be selling and buying your domestic currency (one as the initial investment, the other as a hedge) so regardless of the spot rate, the two actions will still cancel out, no?

      Delete