Thursday, January 24, 2013

Invest In Roth IRA Or 401k?

Reader Question

Hello LTR. Great website and resources. We (33 and 34) have a question on:
1. Max out both ROTH IRAs and up to company match [in 401k].
2. Max one Roth IRA and up to company match and contribute the extra $5k to 401K.
3. Contribute up to 401K match, use extra funds to pay off car loan at 2.99%, with $25K remaining. pay off date is Nov 2016. Once car loan paid off saving rate will nearly double per year.
4. Contribute to one ROTH IRA and up to company match in 401k and just continue savings.
5. Continue with just 401K contributions and save for my 69 Chevy Chevelle. No plans for new car no time soon. LOL

Combined Salary: 121K tax rate: 25% one kid: enters college in 7 years. emergency fund is good debt: mortgage (3.25%, 15 year) and car loan (2.99% 25K remaining, payoff date Nov 2016) current combined 401K amount: $48k Total Contributions (including employee match) per 401K year: $12,111. Savings Account contributions per year: $9K retirement date: 60-62. Thank you. I am torn between option 1 or 2. Thank you

My Reply

Thanks for writing, glad you found my blog useful. First things first. Let's confirm that options 1 and 2 are really the best ones...

Roth IRA takes precedence over the 69 Chevy Chevelle -- that eliminates option 5.

Option 3 may seem like a good way to go because you will not find any other guaranteed investment that will return 2.99% a year by 2016 -- especially after taxes (since car loan is not tax-deductible -- unless it's a business vehicle which I don't think it is). However then you'd be losing out on $25,000 of tax-advantaged space that you will never again be able to regain. In the long run this tax-advantaged space will almost certainly be worth a lot more than the $1,000 or thereabouts you'd save by paying off the loan ahead of schedule. That takes option 3 out.

Option 4 is out because unless you have dire need to build up an emergency fund (and you don't) it never makes sense to invest in taxable space instead of Roth IRA space (or 401k/Traditional IRA space, for that matter).

That leaves options 1 and 2, between which you are torn. These are most likely splitting hairs, but let's think them through. 401k (similar to a traditional IRA) gives you a tax deduction now but will force you to pay taxes on withdrawals. Roth IRA does not give you any tax savings now, but allows for tax-free withdrawals in the future. If you crunch the numbers you will find that:

  • Roth IRA is preferable to 401k/Traditional IRA if your future withdrawal/retirement tax bracket is higher than your current tax bracket
  • 401k/Traditional IRA is preferable if your current tax brackets is higher than your future withdrawal/retirement tax bracket.
Roth IRA has some other niceties but they are relatively minor compared to the above calculation. So here is the logic to follow: 
  • If you are currently in 15% tax bracket (even if you don't put the last $5K into 401k) after all the pre-tax contributions and deductions then I would definitely go with option 1 and max out both Roth IRAs because it is unlikely that your future tax bracket will be even lower than today's 15%. You are probably not in 15% bracket, so this is a moot point.
  • If you are currently in 25% tax bracket (seems likely) then you have to guesstimate what kind of retirement you are looking at. Do you expect to have so much saved and invested by then that combined with Social Security you will be spending much more than you do now (meaning higher tax bracket)? It's possible but your planned retirement in less than 30 years away and you should expect to live another 30 years or even more once you retire. I don't know your career or business prospects, of course, but I would guesstimate that it's likely that your retirement will not be luxurious, with less than $150,000 (in today's money) annual spending -- even with Social Security factored in. That would put you no higher than 25% bracket if tax rates stay constant -- and maybe even 15% tax bracket depending on how the unknowable future unfolds.
So the guess here is that your retirement tax bracket is likely to be same or lower as your current tax bracket. That would have me leaning towards option 2 and contributing extra to 401k instead of maxing out the second Roth IRA. The caveat is that investment choices in your 401k must be as good as what you would invest in Roth IRA -- namely index funds with total expenses in 0.10% range annually. If your 401k choices all have 1.0% and higher expense ratios, then Roth IRA is the way to go, no question. But if your 401k investment options are good then I would lean toward option 2.

Couple more (minor) points in favor of option 2... First, if it turns out that you really do become rich and end up retiring in higher tax bracket then you probably will be just fine, whether or not you make the right Roth IRA vs. 401k choice now. But if you end up having to cut it close in retirement (meaning low tax bracket), then the right choice is contributing to 401k for maximum tax savings. Second -- and this may seem slightly paranoid, but I think it's practical -- it is relatively simple for the government to make Roth IRA withdrawals be effectively taxable even if officially they are not. If we move to a federal sales tax or another VAT-like tax, then the tax-exempt benefit of Roth IRA may diminish (if sales tax/VAT is used alongside income tax) or disappear (if sales tax/VAT supplants income tax entirely). Taking the tax deduction up front with 401k contribution is more of a sure thing.

On the flip side it is possible that future taxes will go up across the board, but then we will all likely be looking at relatively lower savings and investment returns (and Social Security payments) in the coming decades anyway, which means that your retirement will still not be rich. So even if taxes do go up, it's still quite possible that you'll be in the same 25% tax bracket -- just that by then the 25% bracket may start at lower income.

So, to recap, unless you are in 15% tax bracket today or unless your 401k choices are poor (meaning high expenses), based on what you wrote I would go with Option 2 and invest the extra $5K into 401k instead of Roth IRA.

14 comments:

  1. A thank you for the effort. Its something I been thinking about for the last few days. I was the person who ask about asset allocation earlier in the week by the way.

    We calculated our retirement income at $68K a year in today money. This puts us redrawing in the 15% bracket if taxes remain the same. And if they go up, the next level is assumed 25% tax bracket. Which is less taxable income on the $68k, then what I am paying now (25% taxed on $121k). Some from this option 2 sounds better.

    However, how about an option 6, where I don't contribute to ROTH IRA, and send it all to 401Ks account, since I think I will be lower taxes on the retirement income in the future? Maybe the one ROTH IRA is needed for hedge?

    My 401K options for both jobs has index funds at low cost less than 0.3% (0.3% is the highest out of both of us) expense ratio. I can combined both of our 401K as one portfolio as her 401K has awesome index funds (total stock market index and even the extended market index for small-mid caps). The only problem is my contributions are much higher than hers per year.

    Thank you kindly for the help. What you wrote make sense and adding more to 401K could save on our tax bill.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, sending it all to 401k instead of Roth is something I wanted to add to my response but just didn't have time. With $68K projected retirement income you're looking at 15% tax bracket with a lot of room to spare (due to deductions and exemptions). I would probably forego Roth IRA entirely and contribute to 401k instead since it sounds you have some good choices there.

      Delete
    2. Hello.

      Its been a long day as I have been crunching numbers all day trying to determine which options to pick.

      I decided to go with option 3 (contribute more to both 401ks and no ROTH IRA):

      I chose no ROTH IRA for the following reasons:

      1. I want my tax bill (check to government every year) to go down. Its currently about $5500, by fully maxing out ($17.5k) my 401K, I will reduce our taxable income and reduce my yearly tax bill by $2000.

      2. As of now, like I stated before, we don't need ROTH IRA right now as we are assuming our tax rate to be less than or equal 25%. We are in 25% tax bracket now and we project retirement income of $68K. With $68k we are looking at 15% tax bracket with a lot of room to spare (due to deductions and exemptions).

      3. My 401k options are not the best, but I am leaning toward combing my wife and I 401k together for index and cost portfolio. My first option is JP Morgan Target Fund for my 401k and then create a portfolio for the wife account with her good and low cost index funds. Second option is to combine both and use all index funds across both accounts. As you see below my 401K is missing the extended index fund.

      Thanks for your help. Sorry for all the posting. Feel free to comment.

      Delete
  2. Thank you for replying.

    The ultimate problem with going all 401K is that her 401k have better options of funds to pick at cheaper price. Mine has ok funds. I list the 2013 contributions amounts, funds, and cost below:

    My 401K ($19751) has
    American Beacon S&P 500 Idx Instl 0.205%
    Dreyfus Bond Market Index Basic 0.3%
    American Beacon International Equity Index
    (0.25%)
    JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2040 Fund Institutional Class Shares 0.79%

    For mine I am thinking only using:
    SP Index Fund
    Bond Index
    International Index

    The only problem with that asset allocation is I missing the mid/cap extended index fund to complete the total market index fund. And my other Small/mid caps funds have cost above 1%. Now what I can do is just use the ROTH IRA and my 401K to get the best and cheap asset allocation that I want, by using Vanguard Total Market Extended Index fund and their Internatinal Index Fund. Then in my 401k just use the SP Index and Bond Index.

    Her 401K ($3360)
    Spartan® Total Market Index Fund(0.06%
    Spartan® Extended Market Index Fund (0.07%
    Spartan® International Index Fund - Fidelity Advantage 0.12%
    Spartan® 500 Index Fund - Institutional Class 0.04%
    Spartan® U.S. Bond Index Fund Advantage Class 0.10%
    Fidelity Freedom K® 2040 Fund 0.62%

    As you see my wife contributes less, but has better funds options then me.

    So here are my options

    1. Use my wife 401K as one portfolio and mix the index funds for the allocation we want for her. This will get her running in the right direction good. Use my 401K and Vanguard ROTH IRA to complete another portfolio I want with index funds with all my contributions.

    2. Choose the Fidelity Freedom K® 2040 for my wife and use the JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2040 Fund for me and call it a day! Easier, but I am not sure if the cost of these two funds are cheaper or more expensive then going with option 1. The dates meet our retirement as well. But I don't know if option 1 is better.

    And help would be great.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for your help and hope i am not over bothering you. I hope someone else will find what i am doing as a good help as well.

    Can you help me decide on the four options, and then I can move on to allocation (now) and contribution (future) in the next post:
    Please review and share you comments.

    The ultimate problem with going all 401K is that her 401k have better options of funds to pick at cheaper price. Mine has ok funds. I list the 2013 contributions amounts, funds, and cost above:


    AA=80/20 (3 fund port, similar to Vanguard Target 2035 Target Fund)

    His 401K options (all the options have cost above 1%)
    American Beacon S&P 500 Idx Instl 0.205%
    Dreyfus Bond Market Index Basic 0.3%
    American Beacon International Equity Index 0.25%
    JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2040 Fund Institutional Class Shares 0.79%

    Her 401K options (much better choices than mine)
    Spartan® Total Market Index Fund 0.06%
    Spartan® Extended Market Index Fund 0.07%
    Spartan® International Index Fund - Fidelity Advantage 0.12%
    Spartan® 500 Index Fund - Institutional Class 0.04%
    Spartan® U.S. Bond Index Fund Advantage Class 0.10%
    Fidelity Freedom K® 2040 Fund 0.62%

    2013 Contributions
    His 401K ($19751)
    Her 401K ($3360)

    Option 1: Two 401K and no ROTH IRA

    Idea: Use Both 401k as individual portfolios.

    The only problem with option 1 is:
    1. His 401K is missing the extended market index and the other mid/cap funds in 401K are far too expensive (above 1%). Also his International Index fund is incomplete from the emerging market.

    Option 2: Two 401K and one ROTH IRA

    Idea: Use her 401K as individual portfolio and combined his 401K with ROTH IRA to make one portfolio:

    1. Allocating (total market index, bond index, and international index, easy!!) her 401K is doable with her options. No problem here.
    2. With his I can use ROTH IRA International Index and Extended market index to achieve what I am looking for: (45%-SP 500, 15%-extended market, 20% International index, and 20% Bond.
    3. With this option I would have to send $5K to ROTH IRA now to get started for the 2012 and continue contributing for the 2013 year.
    4. If my job changes, I use the Rollover IRA i already have (will set it to Vanguard Target 3035) as account to dump the 401k and keep it going. Then start over with new job 401K options


    Option 2: Two 401K no ROTH IRA

    Idea: Use both 401k to make one portfolio

    1. Use international, SP 500 and Bond Index in his 401k and Extended Market in hers to build on portfolio.
    2. If my job changes, I use the Rollover IRA i already have (will set it to Vanguard Target 3035) as account to dump the 401k and keep it going. Then start over with new job 401K options

    Option 3: Two 401K all Target Funds

    Idea: Use both 401K as target funds

    1. The problem with this idea is the cost. I am not sure how much of a cost differece it makes compared with option 1 and 2.
    2. The good thing is I want have to do any re-balance, just focus on work and increasing more savings
    3. If my job changes, I use the Rollover IRA i already have (will set it to Vanguard Target 3035) as account to dump the 401k and keep it going. Then start over with new job 401K options.
    4. I don't know how well the target funds in our 401k are. I guess expense is all that matters anyway.

    Option 4: Two 401K and one ROTH IRA

    idea: Create one port using all 3 accounts
    1. Use all accounts to create one portfilio.
    2. Only problem is if I change jobs this could screw up allocations. I guess thats for late to worry about

    Option 5: Two 401K and one ROTH IRA

    idea: Use ROTH IRA as Vanguard Target and use both 401K as one port.

    Please feel free to comment on the above plan for now. Appreciate all the help.

    What will be easier for me for the most part is either using the ROTH IRA as Target Fund and combining our two 401K as one portfolio. My only concern is what happen if I change jobs.

    Thank you for your time.

    ReplyDelete
  4. No problem about all the posts. I am glad to help whenever I have some free time.

    From what you wrote, your wife clearly has some great choices in her 401k:
    Spartan® Total Market Index Fund 0.06%
    Spartan® Extended Market Index Fund 0.07%
    Spartan® International Index Fund - Fidelity Advantage 0.12%
    Spartan® 500 Index Fund - Institutional Class 0.04%
    Spartan® U.S. Bond Index Fund Advantage Class 0.10%

    You have a few OK ones in:
    American Beacon S&P 500 Idx Instl 0.205%
    Dreyfus Bond Market Index Basic 0.3% (this expense ratio is starting to push it...)
    American Beacon International Equity Index 0.25%

    I would not touch wither the Fidelity or JPM target date funds because of the expenses. Here is one way to think about it... 401k over Roth IRA is likely to save you about 10% in taxes (difference between 25% and 15% brackets) over ~30-40 year span. Break it down per year and your annual savings are around 0.25%. Going with something that has 0.6% or 0.8% annual expense ratio kills the 0.25% savings right away. It's true that sooner or later either your 401k will have better choices or you will be able to roll it into an IRA, so even a high-expense option might end up palatable. But you can still do better with a mix of low(er)-expenses instead of a pricey target fund.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you LTR. Really appreciate it. You make alot sense. I will have to combine our 401K to really save on expenses.

    One question:

    1. I am not understanding what you wrote "Here is one way to think about it... 401k over Roth IRA is likely to save you about 10% in taxes (difference between 25% and 15% brackets) over ~30-40 year span. Break it down per year and your annual savings are around 0.25%. Going with something that has 0.6% or 0.8% annual expense ratio kills the 0.25% savings right away."

    I know it makes sense, but I am not following the logic. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Basically you are saving 10% of your investment by going with a 401k and 25% tax savings up front versus Roth IRA and 15% tax savings at withdrawal. But it's not a 10% that you are saving every year -- it's 10% you save once over the lifetime of your 401k or Roth, say 30-40 years. Divide 10% by 40 years and you find roughly 0.25% savings per year. I'm just trying to give a magnitude of savings per year, so you can compare it against the extra expense ratios of your 401k. If, for example, you held that JPM target fund for full 30-40 years then its expense ratio would far outweigh the tax savings of 401k over Roth IRA.

      It's not necessarily a fair comparison because chances of you staying in that same job with those some 401k choices for 30-40 years are very slim. But it is a way of thinking of expenses all the same. I was hoping to show how unacceptable those JPM (and even Fidelity) target fund expenses are.

      Delete
    2. Thank you LTR. Basically, you are saying take advantage of cheap index funds as much as possible in the 401Ks as this will save money in the long run. Even if it requires me mixing my wife and I 401Ks to get the proper allocation I need.

      Thanks for the example. Those expense ratios are key. I will have to mix them for now, even if it requires me paying one of my wife bills and her contribute more to get a good match.

      Correction on my Funds expense ratios below.
      American Beacon S&P 500 Idx Instl 0.16%
      Dreyfus Bond Market Index Basic 0.15%
      American Beacon International Equity Index 0.24%

      Thanks for your clear clarification and I keep you updated

      Delete
    3. You're welcome. Yes, keeping expenses as low as possible is probably the most important concept in all of investing. Everything else -- luck, skill, booms, busts -- will more or less average out over time. But expenses will always be a constant drain.

      Delete
  6. Thanks for all your help so far.

    I have concluded how will allocate the current balance and future balance below and will implement this week. Please review if you have time for any comments or questions.

    Desire AA = 80/20
    Total Stock Market = 60% (45% S&P 500 and 15% extended stock market (mid/small cap))
    International = 20%
    Bonds = 20%

    Objective: Combine 401K/403b as one portfolio for reduced expense and future learning of re-balancing low cost 401k funds. His IRA move to Vanguard target fund for low cost and simplicity.

    Current Balances
    Current Balance 401K/403b = $12, 295 (His 10300, Her 1995)
    His Current IRA Rollover = $36K

    Set Current Balance to the following:
    His IRA Rollover $36k:
    100% = Vanguard Target Fund 2030

    His 401k 83.8% $10,300
    45% ($5724) American Beacon S&P 500 Idx Instl 0.16%
    20% ($2459) Dreyfus Bond Market Index Basic 0.15%
    19% ($2144) American Beacon International Equity Index 0.24%

    Her 403b 16.2% $1,995
    16% ($1967) Spartan® Extended Market Index Fund 0.07%

    So, I will make these changes now to give the AA I need. The numbers are slightly off, but I think this will work ok. These number changes daily with the market.


    Future (Starting from Today) Contributions
    His = $16826 (His contribution) + 2917.2 (match) = $19744 I am contributing $17.5K for the year, $673 already contributed for the 2013 year
    Her = $3494
    Total 2013 Contributions : $23238

    His 401k 83.8% $19744
    45% ($10457) American Beacon S&P 500 Idx Instl 0.16% (set contribution in 401k to 53%)
    20% ($4648) Dreyfus Bond Market Index Basic 0.15% (set contribution in 401k to 23%)
    20% ($4648) American Beacon International Equity Index 0.24% (set contribution in 401k to 24%)

    Her 403b 16.2% $3494
    15% ($3486) Spartan® Extended Market Index Fund 0.07% (set contribution in 403b to 100%)

    The numbers are not exactly match the contributions but they come close enough to get it going.

    1. The cost of the combined portfolio 401k/403b will cost $56.67 (not including any gains) by end of 2013. I added up the cost of each fund and how much will money will be in each fund by the end of each year. By going the target fund route for the 401k and 403b, the cost will be $274. Ending balance for HIS is $30,044.00 and HER is $5,489.00 for end of 2013 year. Now I am just messing around now, but in the future I now the see the benefit of combining the least cost index funds as possible.

    2. My only question is do you think my allocation method and contributions looks ok? I tried to keep the allocations as close as possible.

    3. The plan is to re balance this once a year if the percentages are off by +/- 5%. Contribute to it and let it run.

    4. Of course by going the target route for my 401k and me create a portfolio for her and her good funds is an option, but that's another story for now. I am about ready to sum this up for now and continue learning and contributing to others what I have learned.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That looks great to me! Very well thought out. Nice job!

      Delete
  7. Thank you. I am trying to be as simple as possible and use what I have to reduce cost. Like you said the rest is just re-balance and active planning.

    The good thing about the plan is if anyone of us change jobs, the IRA Rollover will act as a place to dump 401k into Vanguard Target fund and let it roll. Then I asset both 401K accounts again for good options and allocate.

    Thank you

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are welcome. This is a very good plan.

      Delete